TESL-0150 - Unit Four - Reflection
In this unit, my class was directed to choose a chapter to
read from the book Developing materials for language teaching. I chose the
chapter called “Materials for teaching vocabulary”, which was written by Paul
Nation (2014). I chose to read this chapter because my lesson plan for Assignment
#3 involves teaching vocabulary to newcomers who are adult ESL literacy
learners. This chapter discusses the following three points: 1) how the incorporation
of vocabulary into teaching and materials development should be planned rather
than opportunistic; 2) that vocabulary materials development should facilitate
the creation of conditions that are conducive to enhanced language learning;
and 3) that these learning conditions need to occur in activities that
encompass the four strand-specific competencies. The strand-specific
competencies include learning from meaning-focused input, learning from
meaning-focused output, deliberate language-focused learning, and fluency
development.
One of the concepts that I found interesting was the
argument that the incorporation of vocabulary into teaching and materials
development should be planned rather than opportunistic. Nation (2014) explains
that good vocabulary materials design involves activities that support the
conditions that are conducive to enhanced language learning, which are defined
as noticing, retrieving, and elaborating. As such, vocabulary materials should
draw the learners’ attention to language features, recall and reuse previously
learned vocabulary and language, and connect previously learned vocabulary and
language to current receptive and performative learning activities. These
activities should include a focus on form, meaning, and use, as well as language
items and systems, group work, and gap filling. The author argues that planned
materials help ensure that vocabulary is available for fluent use. This is an
important consideration since it provides purpose and reinforcement for
vocabulary learning (Nation, 2014).
This concept interested me because it contrasted what I
have read about materials development for adult ESL literacy language learners
upon first glance. While ESL literacy teaching requires a lot of planning and
sequencing activities to build language skills and learning strategies, it also
requires flexibility so that substitute and/or modified activities can be
provided to increase the difficulty level or mitigate challenges that emerge.
Flexibility is also important when learners voice their interests and needs so
that teachers can use these instances as learning opportunities and adapt their
lesson plans. This cannot happen if they are too constrained by the structure of
their lesson plans. As such, it was unclear to me how teachers were supposed to
plan and structure their lessons while still remaining flexible and open to
teachable experiences.
Upon considering this thought, I realized that the choices
were not mutually exclusive—lesson plans and materials can be both structured
and flexible. For example. teachers involved in vocabulary materials design structured
activities and materials that develop and practice using skills but leave options
for scaffolding as learners progress through units. Teachers can also use the
same types of activities with different vocabulary, units, and themes.
In my own teaching, I want to ensure that the vocabulary materials
that I include in my teaching are helpful for my learners. I can do this by using
vocabulary that are practical and meaningful for them and consider their appropriateness
for my learners’ language capabilities. Sometimes it is difficult to brainstorm
effective vocabulary lists that provide enough language and substance that they
can be used for communicative purposes, especially at the CLB Foundation Literacy
level. Doing so requires building basic language skills and learning strategies,
as mentioned above. I explored this issue as part of my evaluation and adapting
materials assignments for this class. Searching for adaptable materials proved
to be difficult as even lower level ESL materials were too complex and often
did not draw attention to the areas necessary for the CLB Foundation Literacy
level.
References
Nation, P. (2014). Materials for teaching vocabulary. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 351-364). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
0 comments